Skip to content

Canadian Rows Inside Foreign VAERS and a Seven-Day Temporal Signal

Day 2 · 5:22:22 · Dr. Jessica Rose

  • 📁 Foreign VAERS holds millions of manufacturer-submitted reports; nearly 9,000 COVID-related rows are Canada-sourced.
  • ⏱️ Most serious Canadian AEs, including deaths, cluster before day 7—the same temporality CDC once used to pull RotaShield.
  • 🚨 Almost half of Canada-sourced VAERS reports are coded serious (vs a 10–15% handbook norm), with 71% of SAEs within seven days and 65% after dose one alone.

Canada-origin VAERS extracts and classic early-onset signal criteria.

← Bungalow-to-Skyscraper: 2021 VAERS Anomaly vs Flu Controls | “Millions of Lives Saved” Rests on Fragile Modeling →

Transcript

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:22:22

You might be stunned to find out that there are a lot of Canadian adverse event reports in VAERS. VAERS has two sets of data, the domestic data, which refers to all the United States of America, and a foreign data set which is just as large, which contains million of— more than a million reports. It's a massive file, and it contains the data submitted by, um, the manufacturers of the products like Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca directly to VAERS from people who are living abroad. Perhaps they're American, perhaps they're not, but there are millions of these reports. As for Canada, there's a way to sift this data out because there are like 58 variables in VAERS that you can choose from. One of them identifies the country of origin of the submitted adverse event report. So there's almost 9,000 COVID shot-related Canada-source AEs reported to VAERS.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:23:27

And as I was saying before, Temporality is like the cornerstone of causation. It's the first step to proving that you have, you know, a vaccine causing a specific adverse event. These are serious adverse events here. So this is a narrow form of the data. And you can see that by Day 7, there were like most of the people who were reported their serious adverse event, and this includes death, happened before Day 7. This is a temporal signal. I used exactly what CDC used before that caused the, the rotavirus vaccine to get pulled from the market. I chose serious adverse events and I went within a week, and it's the same. I mean, if— I guess if it was 1998, maybe they would be doing something. Um, so 43— this is another staggering thing that I found. According to the VAERS handbook, of any set of data that comes in, approximately 10 to 15% of those reports will be considered serious.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:24:36

The ones that came in from Canada, almost half of them were considered serious. This is anomalous in and of itself. This is way above the, the baseline. 71% Of Canadians reported an SAE within 7 days of injection, and this is This is VAERS data. Like, I, I, I just saw this and I was like, what? Does this comprise the adverse event reports that were reported by CAHPS and PHAC, etc.? Like, are they even aware of this? Is there any crosstalk between these datasets? Nobody knows. So again, I use the CDC parameters for withdrawal from a vaccine. Of a vaccine. And I showed that the, the number of serious adverse event reports after dose 1, after dose 1, 1 dose, 5 days to onset, which is 7 days, is the proportion, uh, the major proportion, 65.4%.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:25:37

So this, this is crazy. That's exactly what you look for from a pharmacovigilance database to comprise a signal to follow up and do a causality assessment with the intent of pulling the product from a market if it's killing people. Seems kind of obvious.