Q&A: Did COVID or the Shots Endanger Healthy Children?

Day 1 · 2:56:43 · Dean Allison · Ron Johnson · Chris Lewis

• 🧒 Healthy children had near-zero COVID risk yet were pushed experimental mRNA to normalize the platform.
• ❤️ Myocarditis in young males was known by May yet shots remained recommended; child-death autopsies are still softened.
• 📈 Parents face guilt admitting harm; relative-risk marketing hid tiny absolute benefit against real adverse-event rates.

Age-stratified risk, pediatric mandates, and buried autopsy signals.

← Q&A: What Role Did the WHO Play in National Responses? | Debunking the “3.2 Million Lives Saved” Claim →

Transcript

Dean Allison · 2:56:43

Um, so can I follow up? Um, because there hasn't really been a discussion yet on the danger posed to different age groups. So it does seem clear, um, just like a regular flu, it's, you know, elderly or people with, you know, health issues already that are at Can you speak to in your investigations, for example, we started vaccinating children at 6 months and we're still doing that in Canada. The vaccine is approved for use in Canada, the COVID-19 vaccine, from 6 months of age. In other countries, there's a list of countries that don't allow vaccine for 18 years of age and under. Were our children at risk or did the vaccine put them at risk? And can you speak to the other age groups.

Ron Johnson · 2:57:28

So I, I think it's just without dispute the children had almost a zero risk of serious side effects, unless there, there are certain comorbidities, okay? But I mean, a healthy child virtually had no risk of serious injury or death of COVID um, and yet because they wanted this, they wanted this universal mRNA platform just introduced and become just part of daily life. Uh, again, I just— it was unconscionable that they force this on teenagers, particularly when they knew already by May they were admitting— it's one of the side effects they're admitting— myocarditis, particularly in young men. They still recommended its use. So I mean, that's one thing they absolutely need to be held accountable for. But yeah, I mean, there's, there's generally age stratification. I mean, elderly are generally more vulnerable to just about anything, and they— and that was certainly true in this case, it was kind of unusual. I think about COVID is children were almost without risk, and yet they still had this injected.

Ron Johnson · 2:58:29

So I mean, you know, one of our oversights is, uh, you know, Vinay Prasad issued a memo, leaked, and followed up on, on the 10 child deaths where they had autopsies that the, the CDC, FDA said, you know, probably were caused by the vaccine. And the best— they're still covering that up. The, the people who issued those memos, I mean, they, they've rewritten the memos to, to soften it. Now I'm hearing there's 3 additional child deaths, uh, but can you imagine being a parent who listened to these people lie, bought the lies, and, you know, did what they thought was doing right? I mean, I, I don't want to see, you know, the grandparent die, okay? Even though, you know, the Pfizer employees realize we never tested for transmissibility. We were flying the plane as we were building it. Those are quotes, okay? Can you imagine being one of those parents? You get your kid injected and your child doesn't wake up.

Chris Lewis · 2:59:31

It's not—.

Ron Johnson · 2:59:31

That's not hypothetical.

Speaker A · 2:59:32

It happened. It happened.

Ron Johnson · 2:59:38

And, and that's why these, these officials have to be held accountable for this stuff. That, that's why, again, that's why they'll never admit their they're wrong. But internally they are. I mean, again, they're admitting internally, they got the autopsies. Yeah, this, that child died because he got a vaccine. Pretty much indisputable. By the way, that's just the tip of the iceberg because there weren't many autopsies done.

Dean Allison · 3:00:02

I think you're on a very important point and I just, I wanna stay there for a little bit is my understanding and you're saying it yourself is that children really were at zero risk. I mean, anywhere in the world, a healthy child did not have any risk of dying of COVID and yet we're basically forcing vaccination on children of something that can only be described as experimental. I mean, you didn't even need to read any papers or, or the, um, the clinical trial evidence to know there won't be much evidence there because it rushed, didn't exist before. The mean reporting time was 2 months. So we're basically forcing the treatment on a novel platform on children that we've really only tested for a mean of 2 months. We can't know the short-term effects, let alone the medium-term effects, let alone the long-term effects. Like, how could you predict what the effect's going to be on an entire generation of our children?

Dean Allison · 3:01:02

And there was zero risk. And I, on your point that they can't do accountability, what do parents do? Because just in my circle, I know a lot of children that were seriously harmed, you know, myocarditis and other, other things. And I don't know if I'm a parent and I'm the one that, that made the decision to get my child vaccinated, and then later on I learned, wait a second, they knew they weren't at any this, and yet we're forced to do this. Like, how do you, how do you kind of even get there as a parent? I'm wondering if part of the, the reluctance for society to accept what we've done is that people in decision-making authority, including parents, um, would then have to admit that they've done something harmful.

Ron Johnson · 3:01:51

Yeah, so first of all, understand their main sales pitch for the injection is 95% effective. Sounds really good, doesn't it? So you first have to understand risk-benefit and the difference between relative risk and absolute risk. So let me, as an analogy, I'm not saying these are absolute numbers, but let's take for example, if the absolute risk of you dying from something is 0.1% and you have a 90% reduction in that risk, sounds really good. Well, you're now, you're 0. 0.01. It's a nice reduction, but again, your absolute risk is virtually nil. But for example, with the flu vaccine, again, these are numbers published by the manufacturer, Moderna. The standard flu vaccine has a 2.6% rate of serious adverse events. Now, what is a serious adverse event? Death, a condition that will result in immediate death, permanent disability, or birth defect.

Ron Johnson · 3:02:52

And then there's also a more generalized category in terms of extent of hospital care, medical intervention, that type of thing. But again, serious stuff, 2.6%. For, again, if you're a young person, you're probably not going to die of flu. Do you really want to subject yourself to almost a 3% risk of getting a serious adverse event? Again, the, the cost-benefit ratio, the risk-benefit ratio is just totally whacked, as it was with the injection for children. Now what they just did with the Moderna, because they want to push this mRNA because it is profitable, you can rapidly react to whatever pathogen you're looking for. You know, the flu vaccines, they're always guessing, you know, what, what's the strain that we're trying to vaccinate against. So I understand the appeal for mRNA, but I also understand the risk. So now Moderna comes out with the new flu vaccine. The risk of serious adverse events is 2.7%. So a little bit, 2.6%. So it's, it's approved with flying colors because it's, it's, again, it's, it's like comparing hemlock to arsenic, right?

Ron Johnson · 3:04:00

So whether they're equally safe, equally dangerous. But again, parents have to, you know, we're all going to have to take a look at the absolute risk of getting the disease, having a serious impact from the disease and the absolute risk of the, the intervention. And by the way, recommend to all your audience Adam Seri's book Vaccines on Men. You take a look at some of these videos, The Brady Bunch, they're all laughing about that. Oh, they all got measles. When did measles all become, all of a sudden become an absolute deadly disease? In Adam Seri's, in Aaron Seri's book on page 84, he's got chart that shows the number of deaths of all these infectious childhood diseases the year before a vaccine was available. You know, we keep hearing millions of people, lives saved by these vaccines. If you total up all the deaths of all those childhood diseases that occurred the— in a year before the vaccine, it's less than 5,000.

Ron Johnson · 3:05:06

Again, I'm, I'm not saying people don't die of these things but we got antibiotics now. Medicine has advanced since the Spanish flu. But, but it's become a religion of vaccinology, and it's— vaccinologists simply do not admit ever that their vaccines might actually have a negative impact.