Skip to content

Q&A: When Did Regulators Know Versus When Did They Tell?

Day 1 · 1:43:09 · Ron Johnson · Dean Allison

  • 💣 Johnson’s April 2025 report shows FDA experts warned Peter Marks on 1 March 2021 that the VAERS algorithm would mask signals.
  • 🛑 A corrected run by 26 March revealed 26 signals including sudden cardiac death; the analyst was ordered to stop.
  • 📧 Later emails show officials still defending the old algorithm so they could claim ‘no safety signals’ publicly.

Timeline of buried myocarditis and death signals inside FDA.

← Q&A: Can the Shots Show Negative Efficacy Against COVID? | VAERS Death Spike and 55-Fold Risk Versus Flu Shots →

Transcript

Speaker F · 1:43:09

So I— can I ask another question? You talked about about what they knew versus what they told people. Could you talk a bit about the timeline? Was there like, you know, when they knew something versus when they told the public?

Ron Johnson · 1:43:22

So let's, uh, so on February 8th But I don't want to conflate things here. I mean, I'm going to set aside what Fauci knew. I'm going to talk about my April 29th, what I would consider a bombshell report. Uh, my staff— I got— we're not very serious about oversight, truthfully, in the United States Senate or Congress. We're going to spend money, but, you know, let's, let's not worry about how we spend it. So even though I'm the premier subcommittee Committee of Investigations in the Senate, unlimited, you know, unilateral subpoena power. I've got 6 full-time investigators. So what HHS, the, the people inside the agency, when Bobby Kennedy demanded that they be transparent, they didn't give us the information to our targeted requests, you know, communications between these two.

Ron Johnson · 1:44:22

They dumped 11 million pages on us.

Speaker F · 1:44:24

Boom.

Ron Johnson · 1:44:25

That, that was not designed to help us, but fortunately I've got good staff and we have things like AI and search engines. So out of that 11 million pages, my staff first of all uncovered that they admitted to a signal on myocarditis in May, and rather than issue a full health alert network, they just clinical considerations on their website. So, so rather than say, okay, we have a signal for myocarditis, let's warn the medical community so they're on the lookout. So when a young person comes in, ask them the question, I mean, when'd you get vaccinated? So we get some sense, I mean, is it a real signal or not? That's not what they did. They quietly issued a clinical consideration. But that's minor compared to the real bombshell, which is on March 1st, 2021, one of the premier data mining experts within FDA, Dr. Anna Sharsman, working with the inventor of the algorithm that analyzed VAERS, Bill Dumouchel from Oracle, briefed Dr. Peter Marks, who was head of CBER, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Review, or whatever.

Ron Johnson · 1:45:45

But they approve vaccines and they do safety surveillance. So they warned him that the current algorithm that they were using to analyze this daily survey reports was going to hide and mask safety signals. And they told them, we've got, we've got a new algorithm, it's just going to unmask them.

Speaker B · 1:46:04

So we can see—.

Ron Johnson · 1:46:05

So they did a data run, and by, by March 26th, they presented to senior FDA officials, um, a data run. And I'll go to my chart here. We've assembled this, but these are the safety signals. And you can't really read this, but you'll have to go with me here. Um, want to find the, the exact— well, using the new algorithm, they, they uncovered 26 safety signals, including things like sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell's palsy, different types of strokes, a gonal stroke, uh, basal ganglia stroke. Um, you can see the list, it's just, it's on my website. But rather than tell the public, they ended up telling Dr. Anne Shorstman to cease and desist. Don't do any more data runs. You work at CEDAR, not CBER. Why are we allowing Dr. Shorstman to, to have access to their their data, shut it down.

Ron Johnson · 1:47:11

So, so the world has to understand that by March of 2026 or 2021, 3 months into the administration of these injections, the FDA knew that there were safety signals including sudden cardiac death, and they told no— they are covering up to this And by the way, so I guess, uh, Sean, you have a question?

Dean Allison · 1:47:40

I just want to make sure I understand what you're saying because I think it's important for people to understand. So people are reporting to this adverse reaction system called VAERS, and so there's all these reports, and the FDA has a computer program to analyze those reports to show if there's any safety signals. The person who made the program, who wrote the program the FDA is using, says, actually, the program you're using is going to hide safety signals. I've rewritten the program so that it doesn't hide safety signals. The term was masking, and the FDA refused to use the new program from the actual person that wrote the program they're, they're currently using, saying it doesn't work. But another person within the FDA who also is involved in writing program ran the data anyway using the new program, and it showed horrific safety signals. And, and so the FDA is being told your program's wrong, like, by the guy who wrote the program.

Dean Allison · 1:48:41

And they're being shown data with the corrected program showing horrific safety signals, and they actually tell the person, stop running the data, right? Like, stop creating this data of harm. And just— and correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is, is, is— so like, let's say there were 10,000— I'm just making figures up— but let's say there were 10,000 reports of myocarditis, like, you know, for the Pfizer vaccine. The problem with their program is, is if there were also 10,000 reports of myocarditis with the Moderna vaccine, it would look at the two and say, well, I don't really see a big change.

Ron Johnson · 1:49:19

Yeah, let me just— so I put up a new chart here here.