Q&A: Are Healthy Children at Zero Risk From COVID Illness?¶
Day 4 · 5:58:38 · Myriam Bohémier · Dr. Peter McCullough · Dean Allison
- 👶 Except extreme comorbidities, healthy children faced no meaningful COVID death risk and had no clinical indication.
- 🚫 Vaccinating children was all risk and no benefit; the same equation still holds today.
- 🌍 Canada and Brazil remain outliers still dosing infants while the US and most of Europe have abandoned it.
McCullough calls continued pediatric genetic vaccination complete madness with unknown multi-dose harms.
← Q&A: Can Injuries Appear Years Later From Old Vaccinations? | Q&A: Why Won’t Canada Simply Pull the Vaccines? →
Transcript¶
Myriam Bohémier · 5:58:38
Okay, another question I had is, in Canada, and we had an earlier witness you watched, um, involved in a report that recommended that we stop vaccinating basically 18 and under with the COVID-19 vaccine. Is it your understanding that that age group, you know, healthy children and teenagers, are basically at zero risk from dying of the COVID vaccine?
Dr. Peter McCullough · 5:59:04
Of dying of COVID illness? I'm sorry, illness.
Myriam Bohémier · 5:59:07
I meant illness. I said vaccine. Thank you for correcting.
Dr. Peter McCullough · 5:59:10
Right. You know, at this point in time, I imagine the rate of natural immunity of children is probably near 100%. Obviously, newborns come every year and they are, you know, experiencing their first challenges from viruses. But except in extreme comorbidities, like children with congenital heart and lung disease or cystic fibrosis. There was no risk to children with the infection, and therefore there was no medical necessity. There was no clinical indication, and it was all risk. It was all risk, like the risk that Sean Hartman took. It was all risk and no benefit. And that equation still exists today. It is complete madness that countries like Canada and Brazil are still pushing vaccination in children, even down to 6 months.
Dr. Peter McCullough · 6:00:11
It's been abandoned in the United States. It's been abandoned, uh, in, in Europe, in most countries. So what's unique about Canada and Canada's children to persisting with genetic vaccination? Dose after dose after dose. Everything I presented today is basically at about 1 or 2 or 3 doses. We have no idea what's going to happen when we get to 6, 7, 8 doses.
Myriam Bohémier · 6:00:35
Right, but just, um, to follow up on your point, is so for most countries they no longer vaccinate children and, and youth. So Canada is an outlier in continuing to vaccinate children and youth. And healthy children and youth are in effect, you know, at a zero risk of COVID So it wouldn't make sense even if other countries were still doing it. But we're the outlier now because other countries have figured it out.
Dr. Peter McCullough · 6:01:05
That's correct. And on the record, I don't think these vaccines are safe for anyone. I think they should have been pulled from the market very quickly after the release. And I testified to that extent. It in 2021. I'm on record for it. I was the first doctor of public record to call for withdrawal of the COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S. Senate, and they were a giant failure. This has been a public health debacle, and the problem is we're so deep into it, and every country is so deep into it. I can tell you, our leader of our public health apparatus, Anthony Fauci, sought and obtained 10 years of clemency for crimes that are implicated in this. And he just pled the Fifth Amendment 111 times in front of the U.S. Senate. I sat in that very chair that he— there, and I answered every single question from the Senators for hours. So at the very top of this, not only do we have this incredible public health and scientific misadventure debacle but we have corruption at the very highest levels, and none of your public health agency officials will come clean on this.
Dr. Peter McCullough · 6:02:17
None of them will.
Dean Allison · 6:02:21
Thank you, Dr. McCullough, for being here. I know my colleague's got a question, and I do as well, but Mr. Mott, why don't you go first?