Skip to content

Thorp: ABOG Threat Letter and VAERS Pregnancy Signals

Day 3 · 5:26:01 · James Thorp · Shawn Buckley · Teresa Buckley · Crystal Denomme

  • 📄 A September 2021 ABOG letter to 62,000 OB-GYNs threatened license loss for deviating from HHS vaccine protocols.
  • 📝 Thorp answered with a 98-page letter citing 1,019 peer-reviewed injury reports and massive VAERS safety signals.
  • 📊 Ten-month data showed thousands of pregnancy losses and fetal malformations far exceeding decades of influenza-vaccine reports.

Professional threats and government-database analytics on pregnancy harm.

← Q&A: Buckley's Personal Symptoms After Pfizer | Thorp: Stillbirth Clusters in Fresno, Lionsgate and Ontario →

Transcript

James Thorp · 5:26:01

This is the infamous, the famous threat from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology. And remember, I was a former examiner. This came out September 27th, 2021, and you can read it. There's no data presented here, but in essence, this is saying— this went out to 62,000 OB-GYN doctors, not only in the United States of America, all 50 states, but in 6 provinces of Canada and in Central America, some countries in Central America and South America. And can you imagine, this is basically read between the lines saying, you follow our protocol, our draconian HHS protocols, or you will lose your license and you will lose your accreditation. This is very serious. I've, I've never seen a threat like this. I, I I was very upset.

James Thorp · 5:27:03

I called up George Wendell, who was the executive director, who I knew, it was a colleague of mine, wouldn't talk to me about this. Emailed, they basically threatened my license. I said, okay, we'll see about that. But you can see that they implicated the Federation of State Medical Boards in here. They implicated the American College of Obstetricians in here. They implicated the American Board of Medical Specialties in here. It's right here. It's right here. Now, they erased this and tried to get it off, but this is what they did and they haven't retracted it. What I did was I then— this is not going to happen and I wrote an extensive letter, did extensive analytics, and I wrote this letter to each of the examiners and the board of the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology. This was an extensive letter. This was a 98-page letter because it included just 12 months after the rollout of the vaccine, 1,019 peer-reviewed medical journal references in this letter showing, demonstrating, reporting vaccine injuries or deaths in the medical literature.

James Thorp · 5:28:24

So I reported all those, but I also did my own analytics on the government database. And there was horrible safety signals with pregnancy. And I'm here to show you, I'll run through these quickly, but the first bar is we're just looking at 10 months. This is just October of 2021. You're looking at 20,244 deaths from COVID-19 vaccine compared with 2,000 of influenza for 30 years. This is unbelievable. Um, the next slide, the same setup here. You're looking at pregnancy losses, miscarriage, and fetal deaths. You're looking at a vast safety signal compared to influenza vaccines, even all of the other vaccines together. I want to say that going back to this corruption of Fauci and Biden White House, Vivek Murthy Francis Collins, Rochelle Walensky, the whole crew.

James Thorp · 5:29:28

They had this data. If I go, if I was following their own database from every month since the vaccine rollout, 6 weeks after the vaccine rollout, January 31st, 2020, January 31st, 2021, 6 weeks after the rollout, massive safety signal of pregnancy loss in the COVID-19 vaccine compared to all other vaccines. So this is very disturbing, and this is why I still have my license and why I still have my board certifications, because after this was published and went viral all over the world, they knew they couldn't take my license away Because if they did, there'd be a lawsuit and there would be discovery. This is fetal malformations, just 10 months, significant increase in fetal malformations. This is our first article, multiple, you'll see co-authors, very notable co-authors as you'll see there.

James Thorp · 5:30:33

This was another analysis 18 months after the rollout and—.

Shawn Buckley · 5:30:40

Can I just have you go back to a couple of slides? Back one more. So this is pregnancy losses. That top bar on the right is COVID-19 for 10 months.

James Thorp · 5:30:53

The top—.

Shawn Buckley · 5:30:53

I'm sorry.

James Thorp · 5:30:54

Yeah, you're right.

Shawn Buckley · 5:30:55

Yeah. So on the left, 2737 COVID vaccine.

James Thorp · 5:31:00

Don't do me a—.

Teresa Buckley · 5:31:01

2637.

Speaker F · 5:31:06

Pertes pour le vaccin de la COVID-19 et ensuite c'est moins pour les autres vaccins.

Shawn Buckley · 5:31:15

Donc, en 10 mois, nous avions plus de bébés perdus en raison de la vaccination contre la COVID-19 par rapport à tous les autres vaccins? Oui, c'est ce que je dis.

James Thorp · 5:31:31

Is—.

Crystal Denomme · 5:31:31

Il le savait, ils l'ont quand même mis de l'avant. Et le Canada fait la même chose.

James Thorp · 5:31:39

The Journal of the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons. This is 18 months after rollout, and we compared the adverse events, 18 of them, for the COVID-19 vaccine compared to the influenza vaccines. Now, when we're again comparing vaccines to vaccines, you can't translate that to prevalence. And that's— we see a safety signal. So again, we saw substantial— you're looking at 100 plus. Again, the FDA, CDC safety signal is defined as a risk ratio of 2. A risk ratio of 2 or more. These aren't 3 or 4, these are hundreds or hundreds. We talked about menstrual irregularities before in one of our victims before this morning.

James Thorp · 5:32:40

1,200-Fold increase in abnormal menstrual periods in COVID-19 vaccine compared to other vaccines. And, you know, the— this is a next slide is a— I won't bore you with a forest plot, but again, remember the risk ratio that FDA, CDC is 2. Listen, these risk ratios were so off the chart that look at— we needed to make that x-axis a logarithmic axis, or those dots, the end of the dots would be in Lake Superior all the way over. We had to compress it. But look at these risk ratios, whether you look at miscarriage, fetal death, fetal growth restriction, they're all very significant. This is published in that same journal.