Skip to content

Thorp: Miscarriage Data and NEJM Study Flaws

Day 3 · 5:06:29 · James Thorp

  • 📉 Pfizer 5.3.6 post-marketing data and independent analyses show miscarriage rates around 81-82% among exposed pregnancies.
  • 🧮 Thorp recalculates the Shimabukuro NEJM study: removing late-gestation vaccinations yields ~82% miscarriage instead of the reported 12.6%.
  • ⚠️ Comparisons to influenza vaccine produce 100- to 271-fold elevations in pregnancy loss, stillbirth and neonatal death signals.

Detailed critique of pregnancy-loss statistics and diluted denominators.

← Thorp: Medical Journal Bias and Pharma Capture | Thorp: Hidden Safety Signals and V-Safe Long-COVID →

Transcript

James Thorp · 5:06:29

Now There's been a lot of focus, and, and Senator Ron Johnson and myself took a lot of heat by bringing up the miscarriages associated. And on this slide, you'll see that miscarriages associated with the vaccine are definitely increased. By how much? Nobody knows. There hasn't been— not allowed to be adequately performed studies to determine that. But what I can tell you, the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-marketing data, which I'll show you in a minute, noted a rate of 81%. The Shima Bakoro study, their raw data showed a rate of 82%. Do I trust either of those sources? No, I don't have much confidence. My open letter to the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology noted literally a very significant 271-fold increase in comparison of the COVID-19 vaccine to the influenza vaccine.

James Thorp · 5:07:38

Likewise, our study in the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons Journal noted 177-fold increase in miscarriage with the COVID-19 vaccine compared to the influenza vaccine. Now, uh, Dr. Naomi Wolf, completely separate and independent of me, um, and independent of the Pfizer 5.3.6 data that I analyzed, she came up with a miscarriage rate of 82% from Pfizer's internal papers. Do I trust that data? No, I don't trust anything from Pfizer, uh, or for that matter the New England Journal of Medicine. And then finally, our last study that was published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, looked again at a 114-fold increase. So from comparing COVID-19 vaccines to the influenza vaccines. Now this is, this is Pfizer 5.3.6 data legally mandated by our country to report back the first 90 days.

James Thorp · 5:08:52

Interestingly, they cut it off at 70 days. This is what you see on page 7. I have this data in 2021. There were 42,086 casualties, including 1,223 dead, in just 70 days after the rollout. Importantly, of those dead, 25% died on the first day of the vaccine. And by the way, in your databases, our databases are counted as unvaccinated, unvaccinated, right? Now you can easily do an injure-to-kill ratio simply by taking that 42,086, subtracting the number died, and divided it by the number of died, and you come up with an injured-to-kill ratio of 33.4. Now, if you do that same analytic with the VAERS database, it comes up to about 45.

James Thorp · 5:09:53

Now, I'm for— I'm a disabled Air Force veteran and I know my military history. You look at wars, you're looking at an injured-to-kill ratio that is less than 10. Even the atomic weapons that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, uh, we're looking at an injure-to-kill ratio of less than 5. This is the page 12 of the Pfizer 5.3.6 data. Um, pregnant women weren't supposed to be in here, but 270 of them were in there, majority I won't— this is a very busy slide, but by my analytics, what they reported, there's a miscarriage rate of 81%. The stillbirth rate is fivefold of what it should be by national average. The neonatal death rate is eightfold. The breastfeeding complications were significant. Now, this is the infamous New England Journal of Medicine study.

James Thorp · 5:10:54

It was published on the e-journal June 21st, 20— I'm sorry, April 21st, 2021. Now this is their raw data. What they reported was 827 pregnant women, and they reported 104 miscarriages. Now interesting sleight of hand, they state, you can clearly see in their text, that 700 of these 827 pregnant women didn't receive their COVID-19 vaccine until after 28 weeks. You can't have a miscarriage after 28 weeks. A miscarriage occurs only before 20 weeks. So they diluted the denominator, uh, and they reported a miscarriage rate of 12.6, which is 102 divided by 827. But really, you take that 700 out of the denominator and you're looking at 100 2 over 127, that's a miscarriage rate of 82%.

James Thorp · 5:12:00

Multiple erratum and corrections. I don't believe this article was written by the authors. I think it was ghostwritten. It's horribly, ridiculously written. It's only 10 weeks of data, pregnancy is 40 weeks. And they used the V-safe data system, which is very easy to manipulate as you'll see on subsequent slides. What should a miscarriage rate be? Well, even their 12.6%, if you look at the best study on miscarriage rates by Tong and colleagues published in our main green journal, you're looking at 1.6%. So 12.6% divided by 1.6, you're looking at a risk rate, uh, of COVID-19 vaccine, uh, of even of their lower number, which I don't believe, of 8-fold. So who knows? It's definitely increased. Now I got back to that, um, what appears to be money laundering between the United States government, Rochelle Walensky, and Kashima Bakuro, the whole team over there.