Skip to content

College Charges Dropped After Failed Judicial-Notice Trap

Day 2 · 8:20:55 · Dean Allison · Charles Hoffe · Shawn Buckley

  • 👨‍⚖️ Facing discipline, Hoffe assembled eight expert witnesses and nearly 1,000 pages of scientific evidence.
  • 🛑 The college sought judicial notice that shots are safe and effective to bar any injury defense; the panel refused.
  • 🎭 Charges were dropped with the stated purpose already served: deterring other doctors from “misinformation.”

Disciplinary process used as a censorship example, then abandoned when evidence could not be buried.

← Vaccine-Injury Reports Returned as “Coincidences” | Q&A: Who Is to Blame for COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries? →

Transcript

Dean Allison · 8:20:55

So you actually were professionally disciplined, meaning that you were charged by the college, but they backed down. Yes. After a lot of headache for you. And you were told the reason why they backed down.

Charles Hoffe · 8:21:10

Yes. So, so I had 8 brilliant expert witnesses. I had Dr. James Thorp, who's going to be testifying here. I had Dr. Peter McCulloch. I had Dr. Pierre Corey. I had Jessica Rose, who testified earlier today. I had 8 world experts in their field dealing with each of the areas of accusation against me. And so, um, when the college saw this absolute barrage of top-notch scientific evidence that was backing up what I had been saying about the vaccine injuries, they asked this disciplinary panel, which was my jury, to grant judicial notice to their facts. And one of their facts was that the shots are safe and effective. And so if they grant judicial notice, you're not allowed to contest that. So they wanted this panel to declare that the safe and effective is uncontested.

Charles Hoffe · 8:22:16

It's self-evident, and therefore you cannot— I mean, and so if they had granted that, I would not have been allowed to speak about vaccine injuries in my own defense, and none of the evidence of my expert witnesses, and we had almost 1,000 pages of top-notch scientific evidence. None of it would be allowed to be even admitted as court documents. So they tried to bury my defense behind this thing called judicial notice. And fortunately, by the grace of God, this panel, who I prayed for every day, said no, this safe and effective thing needs to be proven. And I said, hallelujah, thank you, God. And so when they couldn't bury the evidence, they then tried to reschedule the trial twice at times when they knew my lawyer couldn't be present. I mean, they tried every deceitful trick. And then eventually, when they couldn't— nothing worked, they dropped the charges.

Charles Hoffe · 8:23:20

And they wouldn't say—.

Charles Hoffe · 8:23:21

The only—.

Charles Hoffe · 8:23:23

They wouldn't actually say why they dropped the charges. And the only coherent reason in all their verbose language that they gave was effectively, this process has already fulfilled its purpose of acting as deterrent to any other doctor that may wish to spread misinformation.

Dean Allison · 8:23:43

And so I just want to make this clear. So what they're saying is, is that the real reason for going after you was to make an an example, correct, for other doctors within British Columbia is that if you spoke misinformation, yes, which in your case was just raising concerns about vaccine injury and trying to report vaccine injury, don't you dare do that, BC doctors, or you will, you will face what Dr. Hoff faced.

Charles Hoffe · 8:24:11

Yes.

Dean Allison · 8:24:11

So it was meant to scare other doctors into submission.

Charles Hoffe · 8:24:14

This was a censorship tactic. It was to get these doctors to self-censor them. You know, you know, you don't— yeah, don't do what Hoff did. You saw what we did to him.

Shawn Buckley · 8:24:26

Thank you. Now we got a couple— 5 minutes left. I got a couple questions. I got one from Mr. Dawson and, and from one, one from Mr. Dalton. Okay.