Skip to content

Q&A: What Legislation Would Force Clinicians to Report Injuries?

Day 2 · 5:36:00 · Shawn Buckley · Dr. Jessica Rose · Dean Allison

  • ❓ An MP likens U.S. mandatory clinician VAERS reporting to Alberta child-protection duty-to-report laws and asks what Canadian statute would stop specialists from pushing victims back.
  • 🧠 Rose says guilt-tripping must end and disbelief at the top lets doctors deny vaccine injury even in anaphylaxis, escaping any duty to report.
  • ⏸️ Buckley cuts the thread short to protect remaining time for a waiting vaccine-injured witness, while praising Rose’s first-time data.

Legislative duty-to-report ideas and why culture blocks reporting today.

← Rose Closes: Say No Next Time; Inquiry Thanks | James Freeland Sworn: Portrait of His Mother Donna →

Transcript

Shawn Buckley · 5:36:00

Uh, thank you, Doctor, first of all, for all the detailed research and facts that you have presented to the committee.

Speaker L · 5:36:06

Uh, you mentioned that, uh, there is a parallel legislation—.

Shawn Buckley · 5:36:09

There is a legislation in the U.S. that mandates the nurses and, uh, other medical professionals to report these kind of vaccine injuries.

Speaker L · 5:36:18

Uh, and I practiced law for about 12 years before jumping into this role.

Shawn Buckley · 5:36:22

We had a legislation, it's called Child Youth and Family Enhancement in Alberta, that mandates legal professionals, anyone who comes in contact with the children, and they believe that there is a harm or there is a threat, that they need to report to the authorities, and yes, they take it from there. Yet we see all the witnesses, or many of the witnesses, they were in fact being pushed back by the, by the professionals, by the specialists to not report it or not acknowledge that these are vaccine injuries. So not only that, we need to have a parallel legislation in Canada that mandates— if the person— I'm not going to into the conscious of, uh, you mentioned on the conscious part, you on the manufacturers, but, uh, what you think needs to be done in regards to a legislation that would not in fact, uh force the specialist, even though who wants to come up and help, would not force them to go into hide. Rather, it would require them to say, report it to, or make it encourage, encourage the victims to report it and come forward and participate in all these fact-finding.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:37:31

What do I think would help? All this guilt-tripping has to stop. I just don't see how Like, I have to think of it from the top. It's— everybody's afraid from either side of the fence to report, or the doctors are afraid to, um, even in the States they're legally mandated to do so. They're not, they're not, they just refuse. They're off the hook because when your mind doesn't believe in vaccine injury, if you don't believe that it's real and a patient comes comes to you even in anaphylactic shock and they say they just had a vaccine, if you don't believe that that's a thing, then you'll probably deny them and then you're not culpable. You don't have to report. So it's like it has to come from the top. Like we have to stop being—.

Speaker H · 5:38:23

From your point of view, how can we change that status quo then?

Shawn Buckley · 5:38:26

What should be done to change that status quo?

Speaker I · 5:38:29

This kind of thing—.

Shawn Buckley · 5:38:29

Can I interject? And I'm sorry, but it's I don't want to tell a witness at the end that they can't testify, so especially a vaccine injured who's at the end of the day. So I've got— oh, fine, we just got to cut it. But I do want to, um, Dr. Rose, thank you for coming, and I, I hope that the inquiry and public understands you did some original research for this.

Speaker I · 5:38:49

Yeah, yeah.

Shawn Buckley · 5:38:50

And, uh, so this is some of this data, it's, it's being presented for the first time at, um, you know, great work. And Dr. Rose traveled an enormous distance to be here in person, and we think, because we asked you if you would come in person, and we understand that it was a huge inconvenience.

Dean Allison · 5:39:07

No, no, no.

Shawn Buckley · 5:39:08

But we are thankful to have you, and I, I assure you that this has been very valuable. So thank you.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:39:13

Thank you for having me.

Dean Allison · 5:39:15

Dr. Rose, thank you very much as well. We do appreciate it.

Speaker L · 5:39:17

Yes.