Skip to content

U.S. CICP Rejection Rates and Canada’s Secret VISP Design

Day 2 · 4:57:54 · Dr. Jessica Rose

  • 🇺🇸 HHS CICP took 13,333 COVID claims—27× its first decade—yet completed few reviews and rejected over 97% per REACT19.
  • 🔒 ATIP files show Canada’s no-fault VISP/VIAP was planned in secret, run first by Oxaro then PHAC, with conflicts and anti-compensation arguments redacted.
  • 🎯 Documents frame the program as aligning with G7 counterparts amid mandatory vaccines and as a tool to “combat” vaccine hesitancy after a Sept 2020 poll showed ~60% were not strong supporters.

Compensation program failure in the U.S. and secret Canadian design papers.

← Global AE Surge, Bradford Hill and the RotaShield Precedent | VISP Numbers, Appeals and PHAC’s Per-Dose Framing Trick →

Transcript

Dr. Jessica Rose · 4:57:54

One more thing about the US, and this is important. They also have an HHS medical countermeasures injury compensation program, as Senator Johnson pointed out. This is all they have. And they themselves report that they received 13,333 COVID-19 claims, which was 27 times the claims in the program's first decade alone. They completed review of about one-fourth, and they only found, uh, that 3% were completed, and those people were eligible for compensation. That does not mean that they received compensation. And as REACT19 point out, astonishingly, the CICP has rejected over 97% of the COVID-19 vaccine injury claims. So this is a global problem from my point of view. So this is a little bit of information that I found from an ATIP document, um, thanks to the people who got this to me, about the VISP or the VIAP program.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 4:58:57

It is called a no-fault-based compensation program. This was new to me. I had no idea what this meant. And here's the timeline. So late 2020, group of people got together. They, they wanted to design a no-fault vaccine injury compensation scheme in Canada. In June 2021, they created VISSP, which was formally launched. This was run by a private contractor named Oxaro Inc., funded by Ottawa. And on April 1st, 2026, more recently, transitioned to VIAC. Which is run by PHAC. So there's a little bit of a conflict of interest there, if you ask me, because they authorize and promote these so-called vaccines. They're the promoter and the payer. Now something that didn't surprise me but annoyed me was to find out of the eligibility requirements, which means that somebody has to prove that they were seriously and permanently injured. And as we've been hearing here today, I mean, that's almost impossible.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:00:01

To establish causation in the first place is very difficult to do. To do it in the face of agencies and individuals who refuse to acknowledge that even vaccine injury is a thing is even more difficult. So what no-fault, from my understanding, actually means is that proof of negligence is not required. And it actually steers most of the injury claims away from lawsuits, which is very interesting to me. So there's a, there's a bunch of money set aside by the Canadian government for people who can prove that they got injured and they can get some of that money. And as far as I know, they've dealt out about $21 million so far, which is nothing. What I thought was interesting within these, uh, this 362-page document was that the design of the— and the planning of this no-fault vaccine injury compensation program was all in secret.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:01:04

I put the red box around secret, but these documents were labeled secret, and I don't understand how or why that would have been done. All of these plans were done behind closed doors, and it was to by their words, bring Canada in line with its G7 counterparts, um, in the context of mandatory vaccines. I'm going to go quickly through here, uh, the principal reasons to align with other countries like G7 countries and in developing the NICP. Well, if it's principled, then why was it redacted completely, as was the declaration of conflict of interest As were the arguments against vaccine injury compensation, as were the final words. All 3 pages of the conflicts of interest listed by the Canadian COVID-19 vaccine task force members were redacted. All of them. One more thing. This I thought was again very annoying but not surprising.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:02:09

On page 330, there's a question: What is the Government of Canada doing to address vaccine hesitancy? So the World Health Organization identifies vaccine hesitancy as a threat. This is their words. The Government of Canada made addressing this threat a priority, and in early December 2020, PHA consulted with all the other provinces and territories in on the establishment of a pan-Canadian No-Fault Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. And they planned out in this 362-page document how to combat— that's their word— concerns of Canadian citizens. And, you know, Theresa Tam was mentioned yesterday. I was shocked Senator Johnson didn't know who she is, but she was first and, and at the front of this, uh, combating of misinformation campaign and concerns of Canadian citizens, a lot of time and money was spent on studying this concept of vaccine hesitancy.

Dr. Jessica Rose · 5:03:11

And this might shock you, I was surprised by this. A poll was done on September 11, 2020, and it showed that almost 60% of people were not the strong supporters of getting this COVID-19 shot. They were polling people. They were trying to figure out like where, where Canadian citizens stood, and they found out that they stood pretty firmly on the side of not getting it. And that's why the campaign was launched. This, this hesitancy idea needed to be obliterated. Again, their words: combating the concerns regarding vaccine hesitancy was a priority to those involved developing this compensation program.