Skip to content

Isolation Kills: Models and Stress Explain Excess Deaths

Day 1 · 7:47:08 · Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · Shawn Buckley · Dean Allison · Ron Johnson

  • 📐 Rancourt’s peer-reviewed math shows official spread models predict more deaths from confining the elderly than from doing nothing.
  • 😰 He argues isolation and prolonged societal stress—not a circulating virus—drove excess mortality, with men hit harder due to testosterone-driven stress response.
  • 🔁 Repeating the same societal transformation and oppression would reproduce the same excess deaths.

Rancourt closes by arguing isolation and stress, not virus models, explain COVID-era excess deaths.

← Q&A: More Elderly Protection Correlated With More Deaths | Personal Statement on Vaccine-Injured Pregnancy Loss →

Transcript

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · 7:47:08

I mean, and it's not just in the hard data, but we also said, okay, let's believe your scenario about how this thing spreads and how it operates. Let me, let me do the calculation as you would do it and examine if it actually protects the elderly to isolate them and to lock them in. And we, and we, We wrote two peer-reviewed articles on this where we take the, the actual theory of how these things spread and we show by mathematical calculation that if we were to believe you, your own models predict that if you do this, you'll kill more people than if you don't. In other words, if you had done nothing according to your own models, which we don't believe because we've got empirical data that disproves them. But if even If we take your models, it shows that this is a worse thing to do. And the reason it's worse is because you, when you confine sick elderly people together, you make sure that they all can get infected and, and can infect the caregivers and so on.

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · 7:48:14

Whereas traditionally before COVID you would always take them out of the institution and put them somewhere else. You would take them out right away. They were doing the opposite. So according to their own predictions, you're going to cause way more death that way. And so we, I think we showed that mathematically, at least rigorously, that that was the case. So even their thinking was crooked. But yes, our empirical data tells us that if you had done nothing, if you had not responded to this announced pandemic, there would have been no excess mortality. If you had not tried to save the elderly by isolating them and locking them in, you have to know that isolation kills. This is unambiguous. The scientific literature is full. It's a whole area of research. They take little mammals and they confine them to not be able to move in a tube for 15 minutes and they can see the physiological impact of that.

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · 7:49:17

Stress is a killer. Stress is a major killer of animals because the stress response takes all your resources away from your other bodily functions in order to respond to what is stressing you. And so it's a real killer. And that is the fundamental reason why men die more than women. You'll notice on all my graphs that when I have both sexes is there, the mortality for men is always much higher. And that is a universal property irrespective of the cause of death. There's only a few examples, which is diseases and cancers on female organs. Then, then, okay, women will die more of that, obviously. But generally speaking, mortality of men, mortality rates are much higher across the world throughout history. And for every condition that you can name as a cause of death. And the reason for that is that men have testosterone. Men are hardwired to respond to stress.

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · 7:50:17

And so, they respond to stress much more strongly than women. So, their bodily resources are used in that response as opposed to fighting whatever ailments they have and the repairs that they would need in their bodies. And so, there's strong scientific understanding understanding that stress, physiological and biological stress, is the major cause of death of animals.

Shawn Buckley · 7:50:43

Okay?

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · 7:50:44

So you don't have to think in terms of circulating virus or anything. If you really want to understand overall mortality and the real cause of death in human societies, you have to think of how we oppress each each other and the sources of stress. And I can tell you that the dominance hierarchy in our society, the fact that you have a boss and he has a boss and the underlings and how they're underpaid and everything, that structure and how it's maintained by constant aggression and oppression is what makes the underlings unhealthy and die sooner. This is unambiguous. All the anthropologists know this, all the historians know this. For some reason, the medical people don't want to acknowledge it. So if you start doing this kind of process in a society where you completely transform the society, where you remove a person's raison d'être, their place in the world and how they interact with their family members, you remove all that and you cause all this massive stress for a prolonged period of time, there's going to be a lot of deaths.

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · 7:51:56

So if you want the deaths that we saw during COVID you just have to do the same thing over again and you will get it again. And every time you do it, you will get excess deaths in this way.

Dean Allison · 7:52:08

We think we have time for one more intervention, Mr.

Ron Johnson · 7:52:10

Fauci.