Q&A: More Elderly Protection Correlated With More Deaths

Day 1 · 7:45:52 · Shawn Buckley · Denis G. Rancourt, PhD

• 📉 Buckley links Eastern Europe’s lighter compliance culture and false passes to lower harm and revisits the elderly chart.
• 🔴 The red Oxford severity line rose with lockdowns; excess 85+ deaths surged immediately after each intensification.
• 🚫 Rancourt affirms the paradoxical message: do not isolate or lock down the elderly—those protections killed them.

Final exchange on government interventions versus elderly mortality.

← Q&A: Did the Virus Respect Political Boundaries? | Isolation Kills: Models and Stress Explain Excess Deaths →

Transcript

Shawn Buckley · 7:45:52

Do you see a correlation then, um, between governments? So let's say Eastern Europe might not have been as strict in their, in lockdowns and government actions. Like, do you see correlations between government actions and excess mortality?

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · 7:46:08

Yes, well, I've, I've gone to speak to scientists and MDs in Eastern Europe, and I can tell you that the culture is different and the mistrust of government is different, and the way of getting around what you're told to do is different. So there was a lot of things happening that are different. There were a lot, uh, there was a lot more of false vaccine passports, if you like, and certificates and so on that was happening in Eastern Europe, much, much more. There are many differences. But did you have a specific idea in mind?

Shawn Buckley · 7:46:45

Well, I'm just wondering, like, because you were saying with the elderly, you were showing that chart and the red line on that chart was basically showing government interventions. And it almost seemed paradoxically that the more we protected the elderly, the more we killed them. So that the message would be, don't isolate them. Absolutely. Don't lock them down. So if you can comment on that.

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD · 7:47:06

Well, absolutely, that's the message.