Skip to content

Modified mRNA and LNPs Persist and Seed Spike Everywhere

Day 1 · 6:30:33 · Myriam Bohémier · Patrick Provost

  • 🛡️ Nucleotide-modified mRNA is nearly indestructible and remains in bodies far longer than authorities’ “days in the shoulder” claim.
  • 🌐 Lipid nanoparticles distribute systemically, cross barriers, and turn cells into long-term spike factories—technology designed as gene therapy.
  • ⚠️ Provost stresses COVID shots share almost nothing with traditional vaccines except the deltoid injection site.

Biodistribution and durability of vaccine components.

← 42-Day Window Hides Most mRNA Vaccine Harms | Stage-4 Colon Cancer and Silenced Spike Testing →

Transcript

Myriam Bohémier · 6:30:33

When you say that this product can persist in the body, so there's a, uh, uh, mRNA that is, um, and also there's the, the nanolipid particles. These two components have a long-term impact on the body and on biodistribution The authorities could have done a better job in explaining what those gene injections were. We call them COVID-19 vaccine. They're mainly comp— uh, composed of nanoparticles that have mRNA that's modified. So they've talked about mRNA RNA, but to me, this, uh, something that is in the body and will disintegrate, but the one that is modified, which is the one that's in vaccines, it was modified by a process where one of the four nucleotides is modified and it's almost indestructible as a result.

Myriam Bohémier · 6:31:49

This modified mRNA is in human bodies for a long time after vaccines. And I don't agree with the authorities when they say that the injection stays in the, um, shoulder and that the mRNA, uh, disintegrates in few days. It's wrong because of the lipid, uh, component, it will distribute throughout the body. That's why we have over, uh, 1,200, uh, side effects from vaccinations. Pfizer itself has, uh, noticed those different effects that are due to the modified mRNA. I'd like To continue, continue my answer. This can enter in any of our cells and cause the production of spike proteins for, uh, a long-term period.

Myriam Bohémier · 6:33:02

Our cells become spike protein producers, which is concerning. When we know that this can lead to side effects? So if I understand well, the, uh, mRNA is in a container that's a nanolipid particles that are injected in the body, and this, uh, vessel can cross the blood-brain barrier and different— in different parts of the body and to go throughout the body and create that spike protein over and over again. Is that what you're saying? Exactly. The technology was created for genetic therapy or gene therapy. They were looking for a gene that would not degrade and be distributed as widely as possible in the body.

Myriam Bohémier · 6:34:11

These characteristics are not what are— we're looking for in a traditional vaccine. I need to mention to Canadians that COVID injections are not traditional vaccines. Traditional vaccines vaccines are— and create— are stimulating an immune response. COVID injections are genetic, so they contain a gene that's put in the body. The only thing that is in common between those two types of vaccines is the fact that they're injected in a shoulder older. So you realize that public health does not consider side effects beyond 42 days. You wrote on that topic, you wrote scientific, uh, journal articles, and you've talked about general side effect declaration or notification.

Myriam Bohémier · 6:35:27

And that's because before— that was before COVID Can you tell us what the fact that we're only looking at side effects within 42 days and the under-notification of side effects beyond 42 days. So because, uh, the, uh, VAERS, uh, the under, uh, notification, a study was looking at, uh, was done by of people from in pharmacies that, and they were noticing from, uh, those pharmacists were looking at changes in their pharmacy files.

Patrick Provost · 6:36:33

So only a quarter of those changes were within the 42 days. Three-quarters of the side effects happened happened after that 42 days, and they're not taken into consideration by public health. This study that should be, um, uh, better done at a larger scale, well, it showed that side effects should be multiplied by 3 or 4. You talked about the Lazarus study that was cited by Senator Johnson previously. So the unwanted side effects are underdeclared by— in the— both in the U.S. and in Canada, while the official public data should be multiplied by 300 or 400 100, so that we have a real, uh, we have a better look at what's happening.

Patrick Provost · 6:37:41

So we need to look into that and take into consideration side effects that occur as while the product is still in our bodies. He was also sent a study from Dr. And other scientists that shows that what's in the vaccine can stay in the body up to 3 years. It's very concerning. That study was just published. It still needs to be peer-reviewed. There's a patient that was a subjected to, um, different, uh, tests, and they noticed that the vaccine, the, the spike protein and the, uh, vaccine, more than 3 years after the last injections, was still in the body.

Patrick Provost · 6:38:43

Public health only looks at the first 42 days, so they can't have have a, a true picture of what's happening. It raises questions on the use of that technology of the, uh, mRNA, modified mRNA that, um, the, uh, industry tries to push forward. It has several risks associated, and those risks are not considered in the right way. So I'd like now to talk about your personal experience that is similar with under notification.