Skip to content

Q&A: Did Pfizer Even Test Transmission Blocking?

Day 1 · 3:12:56 · Dean Allison · Ron Johnson

  • 🇪🇺 Janine Small told EU Parliament Pfizer never tested whether the shot stopped transmission.
  • ✈️ Ex-Pfizer R&D head said they “flew the plane while building it” while still claiming safe and effective.
  • 📑 Omitted studies include drug interactions, cardio/CNS/organ toxicity, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity—no incentive under liability shields.

Admission that the core social justification for mandates was never studied.

← Q&A: Did Officials Lie About Masks and Six-Foot Distancing? | Q&A: How Did Emergency Orders Bypass Normal Safety Proof? →

Transcript

Dean Allison · 3:12:56

She was the Pfizer, uh, VP that testified in front of the European Parliament. So I think people in Canada believed that the vaccine— because vaccine vaccine, we're trained to think it was the old Merriam-Webster definition that would confer immunity. But with this one, they knew it wouldn't confer immunity. But at least I think we thought, well, it would stop you from transmitting the virus, which is why you'd give it to kids to protect grandma, which is backwards. But can you tell us what Janine's small test fight about? Because I think it will shock people, the, the main vaccine that, that was administered in Canada was Pfizer. And I think it would shock people that they weren't even testing to see if it would stop you spreading it to other people, which kind of begs the question, then why did we take it at all?

Ron Johnson · 3:13:48

So in October of 2020, Janine Small, who was Pfizer's president of international developed markets, admitted to the EU Parliament Pfizer had not tested whether the vaccine prevented transmission. Been tested. A month later, the former head of Pfizer's research and development department, Katherine Janssen, in a November 2022 interview with Nature, said, we flew the plane while we were still building it, but claimed that safe and effective. By the way, the studies that were not conducted— this I got from testimony from one of our hearings, it might have been from Toby Roth, uh, This is a list of omitted studies that should shock everyone. They never tested drug-drug interactions. They never tested for cardiovascular toxicity. They never tested for central nervous system toxicity, other organ toxicity, blood toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity.

Ron Johnson · 3:14:48

I don't think they've tested to this day because that's the whole, that's the gain. Whether it's a childhood vaccine or whether it's this experimental gene therapy, get it approved, and because it's a vaccine in America, you have no liability, you're completely protected. And so there's no incentive for either the drug manufacturer, the vaccine manufacturer, or the government officials that approved it to do the long-term safety studies, studies to disprove prove that they shouldn't have approved it. So there's, there's no— there's every incentive to hide it. There's every incentive to not be honest with the regulators when you go for the approval, which is why, again, I don't have the exact dates, but, uh, you know, the deaths that were in the placebo arm were reported very rapidly, but the deaths in the vaccine arm of the study, they delayed reporting those things to the point where some of them weren't even reported by the time it got the emergency use authorization.

Dean Allison · 3:15:51

Authorization.

Ron Johnson · 3:15:52

So again, again, as I said in the hall, you know, in my investigation, we are finding pieces of the puzzle, but it's like a 1,000-piece puzzle. We maybe got 30 of the pieces. We got a long way to go.